Partner with HUMAN RIGHTS & ANALYTICAL HOUSE, INC.
We collaborate with government, private-sector, and nonprofit partners worldwide who align with core principles:
human dignity, fundamental freedoms, bodily autonomy, and ethical, evidence-based public benefit.
We are explicitly nonpartisan and do not engage in political campaigning or lobbying.Our work is strictly rights-based: research, coordination, public-interest analysis, and support for vulnerable individuals.
We seek practical cooperation with the Board of Peace initiative being shaped by President Trump and his Administration:
human-rights safeguards, analytical support, transparent civil-society participation, and principled peace architecture.
International: UN structures with real public benefit
Global scope
We cooperate with UN-related bodies and programs that demonstrably protect people and do not cause harm.
Where mandates conflict with bodily autonomy and informed consent, we do not participate.
Principles & Boundaries
We are nonpartisan. We do not endorse candidates, run campaigns, or conduct lobbying activity.
We cooperate across borders and sectors exclusively to advance human rights and fundamental freedoms.
What we do
Public-interest research and analysis (human rights, censorship, discrimination, coercive practices)
Coordination and partnership building between credible actors across countries
Documentation, case support, and structured reporting for lawful accountability
Ethics-first advocacy focused on dignity, bodily autonomy, and informed consent
What we do NOT do
Political campaigning or partisan operations
Lobbying or influence-peddling
Participation in initiatives that pressure, coerce, or undermine bodily autonomy and freedom of choice
This page describes organizational principles and partnership boundaries for alignment screening.
Cooperation Tracks
Below are concrete ways to work together. We prioritize clarity, lawful process, and measurable public benefit.
For urgent rights-risk situations: case triage, documentation packaging, trusted referrals, and coordination with appropriate partners.
Priority Cooperation: Board of Peace
We seek cooperation with the Board of Peace initiative announced and chartered under President Trump’s Administration. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Our contribution is pragmatic: rights safeguards, analytical support, and disciplined civil-society participation that strengthens legitimacy.
We are prepared to function as a small but effective civil-society analytical node: documenting rights risks, providing structured reporting,
and supporting principled peace architecture that protects human dignity rather than trading it away.
What we can contribute
Human-rights safeguard framework for peace initiatives (freedom of expression, due process, anti-discrimination)
Risk screening: coercion, collective punishment, censorship, forced medical policies, and other rights violations
Cross-cultural coordination: trusted channels with credible actors in multiple regions
What we request
A clear point of contact or intake pathway for civil-society partnership proposals
Defined scope for analytical support and reporting deliverables
Alignment on nonpartisan, rights-based participation
We do not seek political influence. We seek lawful, rights-based cooperation that delivers measurable public benefit.
International Cooperation: UN Structures (Selective, Harm-Avoiding)
We cooperate with UN-related bodies and programs that produce real, verifiable public benefit and do not cause harm.
Our baseline is “do no harm” plus strict respect for bodily autonomy and freedom of choice.
How we approach UN cooperation
We cooperate with structures whose mandates align with fundamental freedoms and measurable public benefit
We do not participate in initiatives that normalize coercion or undermine informed consent
We prioritize transparency, documentation quality, and human dignity above bureaucracy
If a UN-linked program demonstrably protects people without violating bodily autonomy, we are open to serious cooperation.
Our position on the World Health Organization (WHO)
We do not welcome the World Health Organization (WHO) as a partner organization.
In our view, WHO’s recent governance posture and pandemic-era policy direction were incompatible with human rights,
particularly the freedom of choice and bodily autonomy (informed consent and protection from coercion).
This is a values-based boundary: we cooperate only with structures that protect people without pressuring or overriding bodily autonomy.
We remain open to cooperation with medical and humanitarian actors who demonstrably protect human dignity and informed consent.
Partnership Inquiry
If your organization aligns with these principles, submit a short inquiry below. This form uses an email (mailto) fallback to ensure reliability inside Tilda.
Send a partnership proposal (email-based)
Provide basic details and your intended cooperation track. We respond as quickly as possible.
For sensitive topics, keep the first message high-level and request a secure channel.